But, in view of events at Columbine High, Virginia Tech and Sandy Hook Elementary, or the possibility of some terrorist deciding to target school children, I do believe there should be at least several TRAINED individuals in each institution who are armed and capable of defending the students and staff until the authorities are on the scene.
Attractive authority can be developed through getting to know and emotionally investing in students. Each form will produce different effects on the socially constructed classroom reality and lead to different sorts of results with students. Your students, in turn, will appreciate that you went out of your way to praise them to their parents.
Ladd Elementary, Tatum stood at the door so he could introduce himself and shake hands with each student who walked into the classroom. Those who project an affect characterized by illegitimacy or doubt that they belong in the position will suffer from a limited amount of position authority and will have problems that come with this.
Secondly, an armed guard should be present anytime there are children present. I think so, although many are going to disagree with me.
Why show anyone where the guns are? Coercive authority implies that if a line is crossed something will happen that will be less than desirable for the student.
The local police can do the testing. Look the Part Woodrow Price, a third-year teacher in Port Gibson, Mississippi, believes if you want respect from your students, look like the professional you are.
If they carry guns into schools, they are teaching violence, plain and simple. This implicit relationship is important to ensure that students feel valued and competent.
They will help show unruly pupils that actions have consequences. The question remains who is going to be in charge of the gun? Those rewards are usually employed to influence student behavior.
BUT, Should a weapon be allowed? Shame, punishments, guilt, humiliation, personal attacks, and withdrawal of affection are all forms of ineffective coercive authority.Should Teachers Have the Authority to Remove Disruptive Students from Their Class Permanently?
Tiffany Sahadeo University of Phoenix Teacher should have the authority to remove disruptive students from the classroom because the learning environment may have the potential to become disrupted and not effective. Teacher authority is, in a sense, “the right to ask others to do something.” We ask students to do many things in a day, and we need to make our requests from a basis of authority.
Without it, we would have little efficacy. View Notes - Educational Debate Essay from AED at Brevard Community College.
1 Final Essay Final Project: Should Teachers Have the Authority to Remove Disruptive Students from Their Classes. Related Documents: Should Teachers have the Authority to R Essay Stanford Prison Experiment and Authority Essay American psychologist teacher at Yale University firml believed that humans were naturally aggressive or only under authority.
Laura Mahurin, a teacher in Charlottesville, Virginia, agrees: “Students will test you, so it’s critical that new teachers have a plan in hand when they walk into the classroom the first time.” Even after all the coursework you have completed and the student teaching experience you’ve gained, it’s normal to feel overwhelmed by classroom management.
When a teacher gets frustrated they must remember to step away before they lash out in a way that maybe inappropriate. This is a very important part of a plan of action in the classroom.
Some may say that teachers should not have the authority to remove students temporarily from the classrooms.Download